<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>david.steadson.com &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://david.steadson.com/category/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://david.steadson.com</link>
	<description>a blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:06:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Just launched my new health blog: optimal-health.info</title>
		<link>http://david.steadson.com/2009/05/12/just-launched-my-new-health-blog-optimal-healthinfo/</link>
		<comments>http://david.steadson.com/2009/05/12/just-launched-my-new-health-blog-optimal-healthinfo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://david.steadson.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just launched my new blog focusing on health issues, particularly nutrition. Only a couple of posts up so far, but there&#8217;ll be many more to come! www.optimal-health.info]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just launched my new blog focusing on health issues, particularly nutrition. Only a couple of posts up so far, but there&#8217;ll be many more to come! <a href="http://www.optimal-health.info">www.optimal-health.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://david.steadson.com/2009/05/12/just-launched-my-new-health-blog-optimal-healthinfo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is PR more important than PR when it comes to PR on the internet?</title>
		<link>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/27/is-pr-more-important-than-pr-when-it-comes-to-pr-on-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/27/is-pr-more-important-than-pr-when-it-comes-to-pr-on-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://david.steadson.com/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I came across a blog entry on the website of a Swedish TV company by one of their &#8220;personalities&#8221; in which he essentially stated that one of the world&#8217;s largest and most succesful direct selling companies was an illegal enterprise. (Headline translated to english: Quatro, Amway, and other pyramid scams). I don&#8217;t watch a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I came across a blog entry on the website of a Swedish TV company by one of their &#8220;personalities&#8221; in which he essentially stated that <a href="http://edwardblom.blog.mtgnewmedia.se/2009/02/26/quatro-amway-och-andra-pyramidspel/trackback/">one of the world&#8217;s largest and most succesful direct selling companies was an illegal enterprise</a>. (Headline translated to english: <em>Quatro, Amway, and other pyramid scams</em>). I don&#8217;t watch a lot of TV so I had to go read up on who the blogger, Edward Blom was. It seems that apart from being a TV presenter he&#8217;s also somewhat of an authority on <a href="http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Blom">Swedish business history</a>. He&#8217;s even written books on the topic.</p>
<p>I thought perhaps that despite these credentials he perhaps didn&#8217;t actually realise that &#8220;<em>pyramidspel</em>&#8221; (literally &#8220;pyramid game&#8221;) are illegal and he was doing the all-to-common mistake of using the word to describe companies that use multi-level marketing. Alas, he wasn&#8217;t, as was evidenced in the rest of his post where he claimed &#8220;only the people who get in early make money&#8221; and that you &#8220;make money by recruiting people&#8221; &#8211; two other myths about multi-level marketing.</p>
<p>So here we have a (supposed) business historian and TV personality publicly stating that a 50 yr old global company operating in 90+ countries in territories was an illegal business! I wonder what his lawyer would think about that?</p>
<p>I should have known better but I couldn&#8217;t help but to try to set him straight with <a href="http://edwardblom.blog.mtgnewmedia.se/2009/02/26/quatro-amway-och-andra-pyramidspel/#comment-201">a rather lengthy comment (in english)</a> complete with links to numerous sources talking about <a href="http://blogg.aftonbladet.se//track.php?art=1010629">Amway</a> and the various <a href="http://www.amwaywiki.com/Awards_and_Recognitions">awards and recognitions Amway had received around the world</a>.</p>
<p>To his credit he posted a response <a href="http://edwardblom.blog.mtgnewmedia.se/2009/02/27/fortydligande-om-amway/trackback/">withdrawing the claim against Amway</a>, but he then continued with the myth-building, complete with linking to a 10yr old swedish anonymous anti-amway site that does little more than report <em>other</em> myths &#8211; including doing price comparisons that are completely wrong! (he for example compares the price of a concentrate that when mixed with water make 4 bottles of cleaner to the price of one bottle of a competitor).</p>
<p>That post of course answered the question of why he got his first post so wrong in the first place &#8211; he&#8217;s getting his education about Amway from the Internet. Once upon a time research involved reading reports and studies by respected authors in the field, in particular peer-reviewed research and reports. Even newspapers had editors who would fact check articles before they were published, a form of peer-review. Today however the lazy journalist and researcher does little more than <a href="http://www.google.com">hop onto google</a> to see what they&#8217;ll find. I suspect Edward Blom linked to the article he did for little more reason than it appeared highly in a google.se search for Amway. A decade old, anonymous site, published on a free web hosting service &#8211; and Edward Blom, a published author in the field of business decided that was a good enough place for him to learn about Amway.</p>
<p>How sad. In the &#8220;old&#8221; days he might have had to go to a library. Then he would have found and read books like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0631192298?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thetruaboamw-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0631192298">The Direct Selling Revolution: Understanding the Growth of the Amway Corporation</a> by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Xardel">Professor Dominique Xardel</a>. Professor Xardel is a former head of <a href="http://www.essec.edu/home">ESSEC</a>, one of the most prestigous business schools in Europe, and a former editor of the Harvard Business Review. He spent 2 years researching Amway. Who do you think has the most accurate opinion? Some anonymous blogger who went to one meeting then surfed the net, or a respected business academic who spent 2 years researching the topic?</p>
<p>Alas, today it doesn&#8217;t matter. For the google generation, PR (google Page Rank) is more important than PR (Peer Review) when it comes to PR (Public Relations) on the Internet. What Edward Blom did is all too common, not just for journalists and supposed professionals, but also the public at large.</p>
<p>Is this the final death throes of professional journalism? Are amateur blogs of dubious quality going to rule the information highway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/27/is-pr-more-important-than-pr-when-it-comes-to-pr-on-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time perception and IT jobs</title>
		<link>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/16/time-perception-and-it-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/16/time-perception-and-it-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Perception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://david.steadson.com/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s well known in the IT/Computer field that pretty much every task or project takes at least 2-3 times longer than you will think. If you estimate something will take 3 hours, it will actually take 6-9 hours. If you think it will take 3 months, it will actually take 6-9 months etc etc. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s well known in the IT/Computer field that pretty much every task or project takes at least 2-3 times longer than you will think. If you estimate something will take 3 hours, it will actually take 6-9 hours. If you think it will take 3 months, it will actually take 6-9 months etc etc.</p>
<p>The odd thing about this is that even being aware of this <em>Law of Tripled Time</em>*, computer folk (including myself) still can&#8217;t seem to accurately estimate how long a job will take. Now I think I know why! It&#8217;s because of the <em>Inverse Law of Tripled Time*</em>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s well known in the IT/Computer field that pretty much every task or project takes at least 2-3 times more time than you think it is taking <em>while you&#8217;re actually doing it</em>. You start some task, an after about an hour or so, you look up at the clock and discover that 3 hours or so have actually passed. You start some project, and after a month or so working it, you suddenly realise you&#8217;ve been working at it for 3 months.</p>
<p>So our estimates of how long a project will take are actually fully in sync with how long it <em>feels </em>like it&#8217;s taking &#8211; it&#8217;s just none of it matches what&#8217;s happening on the clock and calendar!</p>
<p><em>* I just made these up, if you see them again, remember you read them here first!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://david.steadson.com/2009/02/16/time-perception-and-it-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First post</title>
		<link>http://david.steadson.com/2008/12/17/first-post/</link>
		<comments>http://david.steadson.com/2008/12/17/first-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://david.steadson.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this is the first post! I&#8217;ve been running a bunch of sites and an Amway focussed blog for many years, but I thought I might start a &#8220;personal&#8221; blog just to write about whatever takes my fancy at the time. So here it is &#8211; http://david.steadson.com! I have eclectic interests so expect this blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is the first post! I&#8217;ve been running a bunch of sites and <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutamway.com">an Amway focussed blog</a> for many years, but I thought I might start a &#8220;personal&#8221; blog just to write about whatever takes my fancy at the time. So here it is &#8211; <a href="http://david.steadson.com">http://david.steadson.com</a>! I have eclectic interests so expect this blog to bounce around all sorts of different topics. I&#8217;ll soon do some IT-related posts about some &#8220;challenges&#8221; I&#8217;ve had setting up this site and migrating some others to a new server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://david.steadson.com/2008/12/17/first-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
